St. Edward’s University is Named 2021 HSI Leader by Fulbright Program

Submitted by szaragoz on Wed, 10/27/2021 - 16:47
Off

AUSTIN, Texas — St. Edward’s University is proud to be named a Fulbright HSI Leader in the inaugural year of this designation.  The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) is recognizing the noteworthy engagement that selected Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) have achieved with the Fulbright Program, the U.S. government’s flagship international educational exchange program. 

St. Edward’s is one of 35 HSIs to receive this distinction nationally, and one of three in Texas. The other Fulbright HSI leaders in Texas are Texas Tech University and the University of Houston. 

“We are thrilled to be named a Fulbright HSI Leader in the inaugural year of the designation. It’s a confirmation of the great work that our Office of Fellowships does to support our gifted and talented Latinx students on their academic journeys,” said Interim Provost Marianne Ward-Peradoza. “St. Edward’s is founded on a global mindset, and the Fulbright program has given our students the opportunity to make a difference in communities around the world.”

Since 2008, 75 Fulbrights have been awarded to our students to teach and conduct research in 19 countries. St. Edward’s was named the nation’s top producer of U.S. Fulbright Students among master’s-granting institutions in 2018–2019 and in 2015–2016. 

Fulbright HSI Leader status has been conferred on this group of 35 HSIs, including St. Edward’s, because they have demonstrated noteworthy engagement with Fulbright exchange participants during the 2019–2021 academic years and have promoted Fulbright Program opportunities on campus. Fulbright HSI Leaders were announced today during an international plenary session at the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU) annual conference.

This initiative is part of the U.S. State Department’s longstanding commitment to build diversity and inclusion within the Fulbright Program and within all the bureau’s international exchange programs. On July 28, 2021, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona released a “Joint Statement of Principles in Support of International Education,” which outlines the many benefits of international education and the need for “all Americans [...] to be equipped with global and cultural competencies.” The Fulbright HSI Leaders Initiative supports the goals of the Joint Statement, including the principle that U.S. participants in international exchanges should reflect the diversity of the United States.

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Academic Programs Ethan Rosenzweig, speaking on behalf of ECA, which sponsors the Fulbright Program, congratulated and thanked the leadership of the designated institutions for recognizing the impact of the Fulbright Program, saying, “Thank you for creating a campus culture that celebrates the mission of Fulbright and international exchanges. Thank you for epitomizing the principle that mutual understanding between peoples of the United States and other countries will lead to a more just and peaceful society at home.” He also praised the faculty, staff and administrators on campus who recruit, advise and support future Fulbrighters throughout the application process, stating "your work epitomizes the values of why we all come to our jobs each and every day . . . to ensure our students have every opportunity to excel beyond goals they may not have believed were ever obtainable.“

Additional Background

In addition to our student Fulbright awards, St. Edward's faculty have also received the Fulbright Scholar award for advanced research and university lecturing abroad. To learn more about the Fulbright awards for students and faculty at St. Edward's University, contact Director of Fellowships Dina Guidubaldi.  

2021 marks the 75th Anniversary of the Fulbright Program. Celebrations throughout the year are highlighting the impressive accomplishments and legacy of the program and its alumni over its first 75 years, both in the United States and around the world. A dedicated 75th anniversary website showcases Fulbright alumni, partner countries and anniversary events.
 
The Fulbright Program was created to increase mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the people of other countries. The primary source of funding for the Fulbright Program is an annual appropriation made by the U.S. Congress to the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs.
 
Fulbright is active in more than 160 countries worldwide and partners with participating governments, host institutions, corporations and foundations in foreign countries and in the United States. Many of these organizations also provide direct and indirect support. ECA sponsors the Fulbright program, and several nonprofit, cooperative partners implement and support the program on the bureau’s behalf. For further information about the Fulbright Program or the U.S. Department of State, please visit the Fulbright Program website or contact the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs Press Office by e-mail at ECA-Press@state.gov.

St. Edward’s University is a 20-year Top Producer of Gilman Scholars

Submitted by szaragoz on Wed, 10/27/2021 - 15:29
Off

AUSTIN, Texas — St. Edward’s University was recognized today by the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs for having produced the most Gilman recipients over the past 20 years in the small institution 20-year overall Top Producer category.

Since 2001, 75 St. Edward’s students have received Gilman awards. The Gilman competition is administered at St. Edward’s University through the Office of Fellowships.

The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is proud to announce the 20-year anniversary of the Benjamin A. Gilman International Scholarship Program and its Top Producing Institutions over the past 20 years.  Throughout its 20-year history, the Department of State’s Gilman Program has reshaped study abroad to make it more accessible and inclusive for American students by providing scholarships to outstanding U.S. undergraduate students who, due to financial constraints, might not otherwise participate. Since the program’s inception in 2001, more than 34,000 Gilman Scholars from all U.S. states, Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories have studied or interned in more than 155 countries around the globe.   

Today at the Diversity Abroad conference, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Ethan Rosenzweig virtually announced the U.S. colleges and universities that have sent the most Gilman Scholars abroad over the past two decades. These institutions were recognized for their support of equity, diversity and accessibility in study abroad for American students through the Gilman Program. The State Department’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, in collaboration with the Institute of International Education, compiles the lists, which are organized by institution size and degree-awarding category.

Based on 20 years of data, the top 20 institutions in four categories are being honored: small, medium, and large institutions and associate-awarding institutions. Colleges and universities in 27 states, plus D.C. and Puerto Rico, are represented, as well as 33 Minority Serving Institutions. 

As the recent Department of State and Department of Education Joint Statement of Principles in Support of International Education noted, “All Americans need to be equipped with global and cultural competencies to navigate the ever-changing landscapes of education, international business, scientific discovery and innovation, and the global economy.”

To learn more about the Gilman awards at St. Edward's University, contact Director of Fellowships Dina Guidubaldi

To learn more about the Gilman and Gilman-McCain Scholarships and how their diverse alumni are pursuing impactful careers in the government, nonprofit, and private sectors, contact eca-press@state.gov and visit www.gilmanscholarship.org.  The website includes a full list of the institutions by category, and additional information on the Gilman Program’s 20th anniversary.

 

 

 

St. Edward’s University Researcher Analyzes 99 Gay/Trans Panic Defense Cases

Submitted by szaragoz on Tue, 10/05/2021 - 15:07
Off

AUSTIN, Texas — St. Edward’s University Associate Professor of Criminal Justice Carsten Andresen is shedding light on a controversial legal strategy, called the gay/trans panic defense, in what is believed to be the largest analysis of gay/trans panic defense murder cases in the social sciences so far.

In his study, titled “Comparing the Gay and Trans Panic Defense,” Andresen delves into the similarities and differences of 99 gay/trans panic defense cases, which took place from 2000 to 2019, where a criminal defendant sought to justify or excuse a murder using a gay/trans panic defense strategy. The study was published online on Aug. 27 in the journal Women & Criminal Justice.

In analyzing these murder cases, Andresen is able to build a more detailed portrait of these often overlooked and heinous crimes. The study, which focuses on provocation and self-defense strategies, divides the cases into three categories — total gay/ trans murders, gay murders, and trans murders. It then highlights key aspects of the cases, including motivation, weapons used, demographics of victims and legal outcomes.

Overall, his analysis found that most of the defendants who raised gay or trans panic defenses were charged and convicted of murder, but that’s only part of the story, Andresen said.

“There’s a bigger picture to consider,” Andresen said. “Gay men and trans women still remain vulnerable to fatal violence because of the gay and trans panic defenses. And the way these defenses play out in court infringes on a victim’s civil rights.”

One of the inherent problems in self-defense gay or trans panic arguments is that it often flips the traditional scripted roles of the courtroom and directs suspicion toward the victims.

“An allegation of sexual assault implies that these victims, who were gay or transgender, were sexual predators rather than victims,” Andresen said.

BEHIND THE NUMBERS

While most defendants analyzed in this study were convicted of murder, suggesting that justice was largely carried out, additional findings still merit more nuanced consideration and analysis, Andresen said.

For instance, the gay/trans panic defense resulted in a reduction in charges from murder to manslaughter for 12 defendants (11.88%). In the future, Andresen would like to try to pinpoint what role the gay or trans panic defense played in the reduction of charges in these cases.

Andresen also found that defendants were more likely to inflict lethal violence on their gay victims using weapons that involved close and personal contact, putting a spotlight on the brutality of these murders. These cases involved knives (42.65%), hands (35.29%), and/or objects (22.06%) such as crow bars, hammers, and tire jacks. For the 29 homicides of gay men that involved a knife, 25 out of 29 of the victims were stabbed multiple times; and at least 20 of these 29 victims were stabbed five or more times.

The findings also draw attention to the greater risk of lethal violence faced by trans women of color. Of the 31 trans women where race/ethnicity information is available, the majority were people of color, with 21 (67.74%) of the victims African-American, 7 Latinx (22.6%), 2 (6.45%) Caucasian, and 1 Native American (3.23%).

Andresen plans to further probe these cases to examine the role that the defendant, and possibly the justice workers and legal professionals, played in creating discriminatory gay and trans panic narratives.

“There needs to be legal education and awareness of LGBTQI+ victims,” Andresen said. “Prosecutors don’t always know how to respond to tropes and stereotypes. Simply put, the blind spots in the criminal justice system make it harder for certain victims to get justice.”

4 types of Gay/Trans Panic Defenses

  • Insanity — Excuse defense, which focuses on the defendant’s state of mind at the time of the crime.
  • Diminished capacity — Excuse defense, which focuses on the defendant’s state of mind at the time of the crime.
  • Provocation — Also an excuse defense, the provocation defense alleges that a gay man or trans woman murder victim—through their own nonviolent behavior toward the defendant—played a role in their own murder.
  • Self-defense — Where the defendant seeks to justify his use of deadly force by claiming he was defending his life from an attempted sexual assault.

Cybersecurity Awareness Month (CSAM) 2021: Do You Have What It Takes to CyberEscape?

Submitted by yyahya on Thu, 09/30/2021 - 20:44
Off

The Office of Information Technology (OIT) is partnering with Living Security during Cyber Security Awareness Month (CSAM) to bring CyberEscape to St. Edward's University from October 18 to October 29.

CyberEscape is a virtual escape room where players will go head-to-head in a timed challenge to put their security awareness knowledge to the test. In this experience, you're a special agent trying to catch a stealthy inside threat before the timer runs out. Solve puzzles, hunt down information in your Evidence Locker and answer security challenge questions to score passcodes. Check out the trailer below for more details.

The logistics: Your team can have up to eight people on a team in the virtual escape room. You will have 60 minutes to beat the clock and defeat the insider threat. Your team will be automatically guided through the escape room. All you have to do is complete the puzzles before the timer runs out. The first person who enters the escape room will be the leader of the group. However, participants are encouraged to switch leaders for each exercise.

You will not need to connect through Zoom or any other video conferencing platform. The entire experience will live in your browser. All you will need to do is sign up for a session, use the access link sent to your email, and play!

You may sign up as many times as you like but only your first attempt will count towards the challenge.

How To Sign Up for a CyberEscape Session

Do you have your team of eight or less players? Great. Now it’s time to sign up for the escape room. See instructions on how to sign up below:

  1. Each player must sign up individually. Make sure everyone on the team has this link: https://bit.ly/CyberEscape21.
  2. In the "Register for CyberEscape" section, click on the Sign Up button that best fits your role (student or employee).
  3. You will be prompted to provide your email address. You will only be able to sign up using your St. Edward's email address.
  4. Once you enter your St. Edward's email address, you will be sent a one-time access code to the email you provided. You will be sent a one-time access code each time you log in.
  5. Enter the one-time code that was sent to your email on the session scheduling page. Once your identity is authorized, you will be able to sign up for a session. 
  6. Find a date and time on the calendar. You may have to use the arrows next to the month and year to navigate to available time slots. Red dots will indicate where there are sessions available. Find a date and time, and then click "Book."
  7. Once you register, you will receive a confirmation email with a direct link to the session. We recommend adding the session to your Google Calendar for easier access, which you can do from your confirmation email.

A note about the available sessions: If your group has mixed roles (both students and employees) OR if you don't see an available time and date for your team(s) to sign up, send an email to support@stedwards.edu with the email subject "Request: CyberEscape Session," and an OIT staff member will create a session for your team(s). OIT staff can also create private sessions for your team, meaning only people who have the session link will be able to join.

Best Practices

  • Join early. Upon joining the escape room session, you will be prompted first to check your audio and video. It's a good idea to join ten minutes earlier than the scheduled time to ensure you don't have any technical issues. Once the session has started, participants will not be able to sign up.
  • Speaking of making sure everything is working properly, let's make sure you're using the right stuff. Living Security recommends only using either Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge browsers to join CyberEscape. If you're having trouble accessing the session (i.e., getting an error), you can try using other browsers. Please see the "Troubleshooting" section below if you are experiencing an error or glitch.
    • Also, make sure you are using the most updated version of your browser. Here's information on how to update your Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge browser.
    • You will have the best experience using a computer browser. We suggest avoiding using your phone browser.
  • Communicate! This is a team-building exercise. You're in a race against the clock (not to mention an insider threat). The best way to get through the escape room before time runs out is to talk through the challenges.
  • Take advantage of the accessibility features available in the virtual escape room by clicking on the button in the bottom right corner with the person icon, as shown below.

A blue circle with an icon of a person in the middle.
Accessibility options button

Prizes

We know what you really want to hear about: the prizes. The grand prizes for the top teams are a sense of accomplishment, a greater knowledge of cybersecurity and, of course, bragging rights.

No, not really. Check out the actual prizes below:

Students

The top four student teams will be entered in a raffle to win our grand prizes.

  • Tier one raffle prize: one 2021 Apple 10.2-inch iPad (one winner)
  • Tier two raffle prize: one pair of Beats Flex All-Day Wireless Earphones in Flame Blue per winner (three winners)

There will only be four grand prize winners. All students who participate will receive an OIT cybersecurity charm as a part of the Experience SEU charm program.

Employees (Staff/Faculty)

The top three employee teams will receive swag bags, which will include, but is not limited to:

  • A "security blanket"
  • OIT t-shirt
  • "Not a password storage device" sticky note pad

Leaderboards

Keep an eye on the competition. Check out the Leaderboards throughout the challenge (October 18 to October 29) to see which team is in the lead — hopefully, it’s yours!

St. Edward’s Student Leaderboard

St. Edward’s Employee Leaderboard

Troubleshooting

If you are experiencing issues either getting access to the escape room or while you're in the escape room, try these troubleshooting steps to make sure you have an optimal experience with CyberEscape. 

Prerequisites: 

  • Make sure you are connected to the internet and using the latest version of your browser. CyberEscape only supports Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge browsers.
  • You can check your internet speed at fast.com — it should be at least 5 Mbps.
  • Your browser may also need to allow access to your microphone and video camera.

If you're getting an error while trying to access the page, try the following steps:

  • Refresh the page.
  • Close the browser window and reopen it.
  • Try an incognito window.
  • Try a different browser.

If you're experiencing some kind of glitch or error while you are in the escape room, try the following steps:

  • Refresh the page. You will not have to re-enter your credentials.
  • Close the browser window and reopen it. By taking this step, you will have to re-enter your credentials. You will receive a new one-time passcode in your email.
  • In the escape room, there is a live chat button in the bottom right corner of the screen. You can use this button to chat with Living Security live support during the escape room session, who will help you troubleshoot the issue.

A teal circle with a white chatbox icon in the middle.
Living Security live chat support button

Living Security also offers support articles for participants in their Support Garden. If you’re having technical difficulties with CyberEscape, contact Living Security support.

Questions about scheduling sessions or other CyberEscape details? Contact OIT.

St. Edward’s University Again Ranks in the Top 10 of the U.S. News & World Report Regional Universities

Submitted by szaragoz on Mon, 09/13/2021 - 09:00
Off

AUSTIN, Texas — For the 3rd year in a row, St. Edward’s is named a top 10 university in U.S. News & World Report’s Best Regional Universities in the West for 2022.

“This is continuing acknowledgment that St. Edward’s educates the hearts and minds of our students by providing distinctive and innovative academic programs and integrated curricular, co-curricular, and extracurricular activities for student success and lifelong learning. Our alumni are taking on the world and leading full and rich lives beyond the Hilltop,” said Montserrat Fuentes, president of St. Edward’s University. “Our faculty and staff are dedicated to the Holy Cross mission providing transformational experiences for our students with a focus on social justice for all.”

St. Edward’s University also ranked among the top 10 in Best Regional Universities West for Veterans, Best Value Schools and Best Undergraduate Teaching. Additionally, the university was recognized as a top A-plus school for B students.

For 19 consecutive years, St. Edward’s has ranked in the U.S. News Best Colleges list. The methodology for the U.S. News ranking takes into account peer assessments, as well as criteria including class size, retention and alumni giving. 

The U.S. News ranking is one of several recognitions the university received this year. In May, Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society named St. Edward’s University to its Transfer Honor Roll for the fourth consecutive year and lauded the university's dynamic pathways created to support transfer students. St. Edward’s also continued a long tradition of Fulbright award recipients and McNair Scholars.

Read more about what makes St. Edward’s University a top 10 school for numerous years in a row.

 

Thinking of Plastic Surgery? Zoom in on this First

Submitted by szaragoz on Mon, 08/23/2021 - 20:56
Off
Plastic Surgery

AUSTIN, Texas — Once considered something to hide, plastic surgery and cosmetic procedures are now a matter-of-fact discussion on reality TV and a proud post on social media. The procedures are also marketed as a way to improve one’s “Zoom Face,” the phenomenon in which people view themselves more critically on the screen. Never before in history have so many people spent so much time staring at themselves.

The normalization of cosmetic surgery and the real cost of surgery, both monetary and emotional, prompted a research team led by St. Edward’s University to better understand what makes someone more or less likely to undergo cosmetic procedures.

Marketer and consumer behavior expert Sarah Mittal of St. Edward’s, psychologist Katherine Warnell of Texas State University in San Marcos, and marketer David H. Silvera decided to focus on how two different thinking styles — analytic and holistic — influenced peoples’ preferences for cosmetic changes and their likelihood to undergo surgery or a cosmetic procedure. Their study was published on July 10 in the marketing research journal Marketing Letters.

“I was especially interested in surgeries, because why would you go under the knife and take those risks? What nudges people, one way or the other?” said Mittal, an assistant professor of Marketing at the Bill Munday School of Business at St. Edward’s University.

The researchers conducted five studies aimed at examining one’s propensity for analytic versus holistic thinking, and found that analytical thinking leads to an openness to cosmetic procedures. The researchers’ findings can have marketing implications for cosmetic surgery providers who are hoping to attract more clients, as well as for consumers who may want to better understand their own motivation before investing in a surgical procedure. 

In the area of consumer psychology, analytic thinking leads to a hyper-focusing effect that drives dissatisfaction with products, or in this case, certain body parts. In contrast, holistic thinking is characterized by a focus on the context as a whole, which can translate into a more forgiving attitude toward products, brands or one’s own imperfections.

“Analytical thinkers tend to rely more on central features in judging products, whereas holistic thinkers weigh both central and peripheral features in their judgments and take a broader view in their evaluations,” Mittal said.

The researchers utilized both behavioral and eye-tracking studies to test their hypothesis that analytical thinkers are more likely to undergo plastic surgery. In the behavioral studies, participants were given tasks that helped the researchers identify holistic/analytic thinkers.

One study, focused specifically on women and preferences for getting a rhinoplasty, adding perceptions of their nose as a potential mediator. First, participants were randomly assigned to the same prime of analytic/ holistic thinking style. Next, participants were asked about their nose and cosmetic procedure perceptions.

Those assigned to the prime to induce analytic thinking were less satisfied with their noses. Furthermore, the less satisfied a participant was with their nose, the more likely they were to get a rhinoplasty. Age, relationship status and body frame size did not play a role.

In the eye-tracking study, the researchers had participants look at photos of themselves in the same way people do when looking on their phone or social media, and then tracked how long they looked at different parts of the image.

“Eye-tracking is a great way to capture moment-by-moment attention. We found lots of variability in how participants looked at photos of themselves and how they felt about looking at those photos,” Warnell of Texas State University said.

“If you spend more time focusing on your nose in particular, you are more open to plastic surgery for your nose because we theorize that the hyper-focus effect leads to lower satisfaction with it,” Mittal added.

In the behavioral study on actual procedures undergone, Mittal split the participants based on their holistic/analytic scores (on a 7.0 scale, those below 3.5 are more analytic vs. those above 3.5 are more holistic). Those who score above the midpoint on analytic thinking are about 15% more likely to have undergone cosmetic procedures. Furthermore, the researchers found that 52% of those who are analytic have had a procedure vs. 35% of those who are holistic.

The results of the study could have applications for marketers and plastic surgery providers. For instance, marketers could manipulate the prospective consumer into hyper-focusing on a piece of their body and then be more open to surgery. The researchers said that a content analysis of marketing materials from Cosmetic Surgery Centers reveals that some facilities are already using strategies that focus customers on specific “flaws.”

While there are marketing applications, Mittal is more interested in the insights it provides for people contemplating plastic surgery or cosmetic procedures.

"If you're thinking about getting cosmetic procedures, maybe you need to take a step back, to be more holistic and think about the future,” Mittal said. “If I have this procedure done, breast enlargement, liposuction, whatever it is, where do I see myself in one, three, five, 10 years from now? Is it actually going to have a long-lasting, positive impact on my life? Is it worth the risk? What is recovery going to look like, even just over the next couple of months? Actually taking a forward focus is something that consumers can do to give them a more holistic view before making a final decision,” she added.

Explainer: Analytic Vs. Holistic Thinking in Consumer Psychology

When consumers evaluate a product holistically, they view the product as a whole; in contrast, when consumers look at a product analytically, they view the product as a composite of various attributes (Baumgartner, 1993).

Subscribe to